Ron@cognitivewarriorproject.com

Should the Death of Former Green Beret Be Included in the growing string of disappearances involving individuals with access to sensitive U.S. information?

Should the Death of Former Green Beret Be Included in the growing string of disappearances involving individuals with access to sensitive U.S. information?

Normally, I don’t tread in ‘conspiracy waters,’ it’s not really my thing, and I don’t have any or have ever had any access to information that would rise to any level of conspiracy theory, but…

I listen to The President’s Daily Brief on my drive to work almost every day. Today’s episode was great as usual. Particularly, the update on Venezuela. It is a slow-moving regime change that I think is showing real promise for success. You should listen for that update and the update on Havana.

 

However, what really piqued my ears was the back of the brief portion, “an unsettling pattern emerges, as an eleventh scientist’s death is linked to a growing string of disappearances involving individuals with access to sensitive U.S. information.” Here is a portion of the transcript from the show:

“Amy Eskridge, a 34-year-old researcher based in Huntsville, AL, who died back in June 2022 from what was ruled a self-inflicted gunshot wound. At the time her death didn’t bring much national attention, but now it’s being reexamined in a way different light because it is being counted as the 11th case in a growing string of scientists who have either died or disappeared, many working in areas tied to the US Military, Nuclear Programs, or connected to UFO-related studies. …

One case does continue to the draw the most attention and that is Eskridge. Not just because of how she died, but because of what she said before she died. She co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science that focused on experimental propulsion concepts, including what she described as anti-gravity research. And in interviews before her death, she warned about what she said was growing pressure surrounding her work. Eskridge said in a 2020 interview, “We discovered anti-gravity and people started sabotaging us, it’s harassment, threats, it’s awful. It you stick your neck out they will bury you.” Who exactly ‘they’ is, is unclear.

And here is the relevant portion from Matthew Livelsberger’s alleged manifesto:

What we have been seeing with ‘ drones’ is the operational use of gravitic propulsion systems powered aircraft by most recently China on the East Coast, but throughout history, the US. Only we and China have this capability. Our OPEN location for this activity is in the box below.

“China has been launching them from the Atlantic from submarines for years, but this activity recently has picked up. As of now, it is just a show of force and they are using it similar to how they used the balloon for sigint and isr, which are also part of the integrated coms system. There are dozens of those balloons in the air at any given time.

“The so what is because of the speed and stealth of these unmanned AC, they are the most dangerous threat to national security that has ever existed. They basically have an unlimited payload capacity and can park it over the WH if they wanted. It’s checkmate.

“USG needs to give the history of this, how we are employing it and weaponizing it, how China is employing them and what the way forward is. China is poised to attack anywhere in the east coast…”

Listen, I have no insider information, but I do know people who know Livelsberger, and to say his death was mysterious is an understatement. I mean, what are the odds that two high-profile deaths less than 3 years apart would be centered around the same thing?